60 research outputs found
Pilot of a Computerised Antithrombotic Risk Assessment Tool Version 2 (CARATV2.0) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
Â
Background: The decision-making process for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) requires a comprehensive assessment of risk vs. benefit and an appropriate selection of antithrombotic agents (e.g., warfarin, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants [NOACs]). The aim of this pilot-test was to examine the impact of a customised decision support tool — the Computerised Antithrombotic Risk Assessment Tool (CARATV2.0) using antithrombotic therapy on a cohort of patients with AF.
Methods: In this prospective interventional study, 251 patients with AF aged ≥ 65 years, admitted to a teaching hospital in Australia were recruited. CARATV2.0 generated treatment recommendations based on patient medical information. Recommendations were provided to prescribers for consideration.
Results: At baseline (admission), 30.3% of patients were prescribed warfarin, 26.7% an antiplatelet, 8.4% apixaban, 8.0% rivaroxaban, 3.6% dabigatran. CARATV2.0 recommended a change of therapy for 153 (61.0%) patients. Through recommendations of CARATV2.0, at discharge, 40.2% of patients were prescribed warfarin, 17.7% antiplatelet, 14.3% apixaban, 10.4% rivaroxaban, 5.6% dabigatran. Overall, the proportion of patients receiving an antithrombotic on discharge increased significantly from baseline (admission) (baseline 77.2% vs. 89.2%; p < 0.001). Prescribers moderately agreed with CARATV2.0’s recommendations (kappa = 0.275, p < 0.001). Practical medication safety issues were cited as major reasons for not accepting a desire to continue therapy with CARATV2.0’s recommendations. Factors predicting the prescription of antiplatelets rather than anticoagulants included higher bleeding risk and high risk of falls. An inter-speciality difference in therapy selection was detected.
Conclusions: This decision support tool can help optimise the use of antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF by considering risk versus benefit profiles and rationalising treatment selection. (Cardiol J 2017; 24, 2: 176–187
Submodular Load Clustering with Robust Principal Component Analysis
Traditional load analysis is facing challenges with the new electricity usage
patterns due to demand response as well as increasing deployment of distributed
generations, including photovoltaics (PV), electric vehicles (EV), and energy
storage systems (ESS). At the transmission system, despite of irregular load
behaviors at different areas, highly aggregated load shapes still share similar
characteristics. Load clustering is to discover such intrinsic patterns and
provide useful information to other load applications, such as load forecasting
and load modeling. This paper proposes an efficient submodular load clustering
method for transmission-level load areas. Robust principal component analysis
(R-PCA) firstly decomposes the annual load profiles into low-rank components
and sparse components to extract key features. A novel submodular cluster
center selection technique is then applied to determine the optimal cluster
centers through constructed similarity graph. Following the selection results,
load areas are efficiently assigned to different clusters for further load
analysis and applications. Numerical results obtained from PJM load demonstrate
the effectiveness of the proposed approach.Comment: Accepted by 2019 IEEE PES General Meeting, Atlanta, G
- …